Ipilimumab NCT07770100 Clinical Landscape 2026

Explore the PatSnap Life Sciences MCP marketplace

This Clinical Landscape Report was built with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP workflows. Clinical Trials MCP supplies protocol and result records, Drug & Asset MCP adds asset context, and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP resolves sponsor background. Use the same structured MCP building blocks in your research workflow.

Data snapshot: 11 September 2026. This strategic research report is not medical, regulatory or investment advice. Trial status and dates can change.

Phase 2

Clinical phase

Not yet recruiting

Recruitment status

35

Planned enrollment

2040-02-28

Primary-completion proxy

Executive view

NCT07770100 evaluates Ipilimumab in Esophageal Carcinoma. The disclosed sponsor is University of Kentucky, the design is Interventional, and the geographic footprint is United States. The first listed primary endpoint is 6-Month Progression-Free Survival (PFS), assessed over 6 Months.

The key landscape question is whether this protocol can generate a clinically interpretable signal relative to nearby programs. Phase alone is not a measure of evidence quality. Endpoint relevance, comparator choice, masking, enrollment feasibility, patient selection, country coverage and follow-up must be considered together.

PatSnap MCP Servers make this assessment reproducible by keeping protocol facts, result evidence, asset attributes and sponsor identity in separate structured calls.

How the MCP evidence stack was assembled

Clinical Trials MCP clinical_trial_fetch retrieved the design, outcomes, phase, status, enrollment, sponsor, countries and timing for NCT07770100 and selected peers. clinical_trial_result_fetch supplied detailed result records from the wider Esophageal Carcinoma landscape. Drug & Asset MCP drug_fetch was queried for Ipilimumab, while Company & Deal Intelligence MCP organization_fetch was queried for University of Kentucky.

This separation reduces a common diligence error: treating a registry label, a company description or a result excerpt as if each represented the complete evidence package. Explore the source workflow at the PatSnap MCP marketplace.

Trial landscape table

Trial	Asset / intervention	Phase / status	Sponsor	Geography	Primary endpoint	Readout proxy
NCT07770100	Ipilimumab	Phase 2 / Not yet recruiting	University of Kentucky	United States	6-Month Progression-Free Survival (PFS) 6 Months	2040-02-28
NCT07811375	Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel	Phase 2 / Not yet recruiting	Anhui Provincial Hospital	China	Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) Rate At definitive surgery, planned 28-42 days after completion of the thi…	2029-03-31
NCT07801027	Cisplatin	Phase 4 / Not yet recruiting	Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC	Geography not reported	Number of Participants Who Experienced One or More Adverse Events (AEs) Up to approximately 27 months	2030-01-31
NCT07797153	JSKN033	Phase 3 / Not yet recruiting	Jiangsu Alphamab Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd	China	Progression-free Survival (PFS) assessed by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) as per RECIST 1.1 Up to approximately 27 months	2028-12-01

The table aligns endpoints, sponsors, phases, geographies and readout proxies. It is descriptive, not a head-to-head efficacy comparison. Differences in population, baseline risk, intervention schedule and follow-up can dominate apparent cross-trial differences.

Reproduce the trial-to-asset workflow with PatSnap MCP

Protocol design and endpoint interpretation

NCT07770100 is a Phase 2, not yet recruiting study with 35 planned participants. Allocation is N/A, masking is None (Open Label), and the intervention model is Single Group Assignment.

The primary endpoint is “6-Month Progression-Free Survival (PFS)” over “6 Months.” The retrieved endpoint description is: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) measured from study enrollment until disease progression or death from any cause..

Interpretation should test whether the endpoint captures a clinically meaningful change, whether its time horizon matches the proposed biology, and whether treatment discontinuation or missing data can bias the estimate. The planned enrollment of 35 should be assessed against expected effect size, event frequency, multiplicity, subgroup plans and attrition.

No named control drug was returned in the protocol field set. A placebo comparator can strengthen internal efficacy assessment, while an active comparator may better test clinical differentiation. Single-arm and open-label programs require greater weight on objective outcomes, independent assessment and external benchmarks.

Indexed readouts in the surrounding landscape

3 recent result records were selected as contextual evidence for Esophageal Carcinoma. These records do not establish direct evidence for NCT07770100 unless the registration number matches.

Acceptability and Feasibility of Combination Treatment for Cervical Precancer Among South African Women Living With HIV

Not Applicable; n=180; Number of Participants Retained in the Study Through Week 24: Risk Difference (RD) = -6.7(95% CI, -14.4 to -0.5); Number of Participants Retained in the Study Through Week 24: Risk Difference (RD) = -6.7(95% CI, -14.4 to -0.5) Source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT05413811

A Phase 1/2, Open-Label, Multi-Arm Trial to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Biological, and Clinical Activity of AGEN1884 in Combination With AGEN2034 in S…

Phase 1/2; n=175; Phase 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) = 26.2 percentage of participants (95% Confidence Interval, 19.7 - 33.9) Source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT03495882

A Phase II Study Assessing Safety and Efficacy of Cabozantinib for Advanced or Metastatic Cervical Carcinoma After Platinum Treatment Failure

Phase 2; n=57; Efficacy of Cabozantinib: Proportion of Patients With Disease Control Rate = 25 Participants Source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04205799

Result fields should be reconciled with the source record before quantitative comparison. Population definitions, analysis sets, dose cohorts, estimands, confidence intervals, rescue therapy and follow-up can materially change the meaning of a numerical endpoint. Clinical Trials MCP supports repeatable refreshes as result records change.

Asset and sponsor context

No exact Drug & Asset MCP profile was returned for the protocol wording “Ipilimumab.” The report therefore avoids inferring modality, target or global development stage from the name alone.

University of Kentucky is indexed in United States with the website http://www.uky.edu. The University of Kentucky will be one of the nation's 20 best public research universities. The record lists 29 development-stage drug assets.

For execution diligence, monitor sponsor ownership, collaborator additions, site expansion, protocol amendments and enrollment revisions. A change in ownership or geography can alter operational confidence as well as the commercial meaning of a future readout.

Development white space

Endpoint white space. Determine whether a more patient-relevant outcome, longer durability window or blinded central assessment would resolve uncertainty left by the current endpoint.
Population white space. Test biomarker-defined, treatment-line or risk-stratified subgroups where effect size and unmet need could be clearer.
Comparator white space. Identify whether the study can support differentiation against the current standard of care rather than only activity against baseline or placebo.
Geographic white space. Assess whether the disclosed footprint supports recruitment, regulatory transferability and commercial generalizability.
Sequencing white space. Clarify whether Ipilimumab is intended for monotherapy, combination, maintenance, rescue or an earlier treatment line.

White space should be framed as an unanswered development question, not merely an unoccupied mechanism label. A credible program closes a measurable clinical uncertainty with a design that can be executed and interpreted.

Strategic implications and next readouts

For sponsors, the endpoint hierarchy, safety window, enrollment pace and protocol amendment history should all support the same target product profile. Advancement criteria should be set before the readout and tied to clinical effect, uncertainty, tolerability and operational feasibility.

For business-development teams, differentiation may come from a sharper population, stronger comparator, more durable benefit, simpler delivery or clearer sequencing role. For investors, the central risk is evidence quality relative to time and capital, not the phase label in isolation.

Track recruitment status, enrollment changes, primary-completion timing, endpoint revisions, new result records, sponsor ownership and collaborator changes. Re-run the PatSnap MCP workflow when a surrogate becomes a clinical outcome, a single-country study expands, the comparator changes or a new result materially shifts the competitive benchmark.

Source trail and bottom line

Anchor trial: NCT07770100
Protocol source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07770100
MCP sources: Clinical Trials MCP (clinical_trial_fetch and clinical_trial_result_fetch); Drug & Asset MCP (drug_fetch); Company & Deal Intelligence MCP (organization_fetch).
Data snapshot: 11 September 2026.

Ipilimumab in Esophageal Carcinoma is best understood through the interaction of protocol design, surrounding readouts, asset context and sponsor execution. The current record makes 6-Month Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and 2040-02-28 the leading decision points.

Build and refresh clinical landscape reports with PatSnap MCP