Nalbuphine Hydrochloride in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: NCT07671911 Clinical Landscape Report 2026
Explore the PatSnap Life Sciences MCP marketplace
This Clinical Landscape Report was built with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP workflows. Clinical Trials MCP supplies protocol and result records, Drug & Asset MCP adds asset context, and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP resolves sponsor background. Use the same structured MCP building blocks in your research workflow.
Data snapshot: 11 September 2026. This strategic research report is not medical, regulatory or investment advice. Trial status and dates can change.
Phase 3
Clinical phase
Recruiting
Recruitment status
306
Planned enrollment
2028-06-01
Primary-completion proxy
Executive view
NCT07671911 evaluates Nalbuphine Hydrochloride in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. The disclosed sponsor is Trevi Therapeutics, Inc., the design is Interventional, and the geographic footprint is United States. The first listed primary endpoint is Relative Change from Baseline in 24-hour Cough Frequency at Week 26, assessed over Baseline, Week 26.
The key landscape question is whether this protocol can generate a clinically interpretable signal relative to nearby programs. Phase alone is not a measure of evidence quality. Endpoint relevance, comparator choice, masking, enrollment feasibility, patient selection, country coverage and follow-up must be considered together.
PatSnap MCP Servers make this assessment reproducible by keeping protocol facts, result evidence, asset attributes and sponsor identity in separate structured calls.
How the MCP evidence stack was assembled
Clinical Trials MCP clinical_trial_fetch retrieved the design, outcomes, phase, status, enrollment, sponsor, countries and timing for NCT07671911 and selected peers. clinical_trial_result_fetch supplied detailed result records from the wider Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis landscape. Drug & Asset MCP drug_fetch was queried for Nalbuphine Hydrochloride, while Company & Deal Intelligence MCP organization_fetch was queried for Trevi Therapeutics, Inc..
This separation reduces a common diligence error: treating a registry label, a company description or a result excerpt as if each represented the complete evidence package. Explore the source workflow at the PatSnap MCP marketplace.
Trial landscape table
| Trial | Asset / intervention | Phase / status | Sponsor | Geography | Primary endpoint | Readout proxy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT07671911 | Nalbuphine Hydrochloride | Phase 3 / Recruiting | Trevi Therapeutics, Inc. | United States | Relative Change from Baseline in 24-hour Cough Frequency at Week 26 Baseline, Week 26 | 2028-06-01 |
| NCT07719023 | GDC-3280 | Phase 3 / Not yet recruiting | Shanghai Ark Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | China | Absolute change from baseline in FVC at Week 52 Baseline to Week 52 | 2028-09-30 |
| NCT07687459 | Rentosertib | Phase 3 / Not yet recruiting | InSilico Medicine Hong Kong Ltd. | China | the annual rate of forced vital capacity (FVC; mL) decline over 52 weeks. Weeks 0,4,12,26,39,52 | 2029-10-30 |
| NCT07679893 | Nintedanib esylate | Phase 2 / Recruiting | MannKind Corp. | Canada | Safety and Efficacy From enrollment to the end of randomized treatment at 12 weeks | 2028-01-30 |
| NCT07674745 | Rituximab | Phase 2 / Not yet recruiting | The University of Alabama at Birmingham | United States | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) 180 days or latest available observation (e.g., at 30, 90, or 180 day… | 2030-09-30 |
The table aligns endpoints, sponsors, phases, geographies and readout proxies. It is descriptive, not a head-to-head efficacy comparison. Differences in population, baseline risk, intervention schedule and follow-up can dominate apparent cross-trial differences.
Reproduce the trial-to-asset workflow with PatSnap MCP
Protocol design and endpoint interpretation
NCT07671911 is a Phase 3, recruiting study with 306 planned participants. Allocation is Randomized, masking is Double, and the intervention model is Parallel Assignment.
The primary endpoint is “Relative Change from Baseline in 24-hour Cough Frequency at Week 26” over “Baseline, Week 26.” No additional primary-endpoint description was returned in the selected field set.
Interpretation should test whether the endpoint captures a clinically meaningful change, whether its time horizon matches the proposed biology, and whether treatment discontinuation or missing data can bias the estimate. The planned enrollment of 306 should be assessed against expected effect size, event frequency, multiplicity, subgroup plans and attrition.
No named control drug was returned in the protocol field set. A placebo comparator can strengthen internal efficacy assessment, while an active comparator may better test clinical differentiation. Single-arm and open-label programs require greater weight on objective outcomes, independent assessment and external benchmarks.
Indexed readouts in the surrounding landscape
5 recent result records were selected as contextual evidence for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. These records do not establish direct evidence for NCT07671911 unless the registration number matches.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Dose-ranging, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bexotegrast (PLN-74809) for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosi…
Phase 2; n=320; Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity at Week 52(Mean) = 38.0 mL (Standard Deviation, NA); Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity at Week 52(Mean) = 176.0 mL (Standard Deviation, NA) Source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT06097260
Deupirfenidone compared with pirfenidone and placebo in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (ELEVATE-IPF): a phase 2b randomized placebo-controlled trial
Phase 2; n=257; FVC(change in) = -110.71 mL ( -148.75 to -70.98); FVC(change in) = -48.42 mL ( -87.66 to -9.04) Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42085224/
Phase 3 Trials of Inhaled Treprostinil for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Phase 3; n=598; Clinical worsening = 44.5 % ; Clinical worsening = 31.8 % Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42149993/
Result fields should be reconciled with the source record before quantitative comparison. Population definitions, analysis sets, dose cohorts, estimands, confidence intervals, rescue therapy and follow-up can materially change the meaning of a numerical endpoint. Clinical Trials MCP supports repeatable refreshes as result records change.
Asset and sponsor context
Nalbuphine Hydrochloride is indexed as Small molecule drug with κ opioid receptor x μ opioid receptor biology and a global stage of Approved. The asset profile lists Endo International Plc as an originator or developer.
No exact Company & Deal Intelligence profile was returned for Trevi Therapeutics, Inc.. Sponsor identity is retained from the trial protocol without adding unsupported corporate claims.
For execution diligence, monitor sponsor ownership, collaborator additions, site expansion, protocol amendments and enrollment revisions. A change in ownership or geography can alter operational confidence as well as the commercial meaning of a future readout.
Development white space
- Endpoint white space. Determine whether a more patient-relevant outcome, longer durability window or blinded central assessment would resolve uncertainty left by the current endpoint.
- Population white space. Test biomarker-defined, treatment-line or risk-stratified subgroups where effect size and unmet need could be clearer.
- Comparator white space. Identify whether the study can support differentiation against the current standard of care rather than only activity against baseline or placebo.
- Geographic white space. Assess whether the disclosed footprint supports recruitment, regulatory transferability and commercial generalizability.
- Sequencing white space. Clarify whether Nalbuphine Hydrochloride is intended for monotherapy, combination, maintenance, rescue or an earlier treatment line.
White space should be framed as an unanswered development question, not merely an unoccupied mechanism label. A credible program closes a measurable clinical uncertainty with a design that can be executed and interpreted.
Strategic implications and next readouts
For sponsors, the endpoint hierarchy, safety window, enrollment pace and protocol amendment history should all support the same target product profile. Advancement criteria should be set before the readout and tied to clinical effect, uncertainty, tolerability and operational feasibility.
For business-development teams, differentiation may come from a sharper population, stronger comparator, more durable benefit, simpler delivery or clearer sequencing role. For investors, the central risk is evidence quality relative to time and capital, not the phase label in isolation.
Track recruitment status, enrollment changes, primary-completion timing, endpoint revisions, new result records, sponsor ownership and collaborator changes. Re-run the PatSnap MCP workflow when a surrogate becomes a clinical outcome, a single-country study expands, the comparator changes or a new result materially shifts the competitive benchmark.
Source trail and bottom line
Anchor trial: NCT07671911
Protocol source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07671911
MCP sources: Clinical Trials MCP (clinical_trial_fetch and clinical_trial_result_fetch); Drug & Asset MCP (drug_fetch); Company & Deal Intelligence MCP (organization_fetch).
Data snapshot: 11 September 2026.
Nalbuphine Hydrochloride in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis is best understood through the interaction of protocol design, surrounding readouts, asset context and sponsor execution. The current record makes Relative Change from Baseline in 24-hour Cough Frequency at Week 26 and 2028-06-01 the leading decision points.
Build and refresh clinical landscape reports with PatSnap MCP
