This Deramiocel Drug Asset Due Diligence Report was built with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP workflows. Drug & Asset MCP establishes identity, ownership and stage; Clinical Trials MCP checks design, endpoints and readouts; Company & Deal Intelligence MCP reconstructs transaction precedent. Explore the MCP servers used in this report.
Decision date: 15 July 2026. Currency fields are presented in US$ millions as returned by the deal dataset. This is a screening memorandum, not legal, medical, patent or investment advice.
NDA/BLA
Highest phase
11
Registered trials
15
Result records
1
Matched deals
Advance diligence: development maturity and available evidence support continued investment, subject to indication-specific safety, IP, and commercial gates.
The central underwriting question is whether Deramiocel can convert its Stem cell therapy profile and Not disclosed biology into clinically meaningful differentiation while preserving an investable safety, IP and commercial position.
| Asset | Deramiocel (query alias: Deramiocel) |
|---|---|
| Modality / target | Stem cell therapy; Not disclosed; Cell replacements |
| Highest global status | NDA/BLA |
| Originator | Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. |
| Active developers | Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. |
The MCP disease footprint includes Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne, Becker Muscular Dystrophy. The highest-phase flag is a useful orientation point, but the licensing case depends on indication-level evidence and rights, not the global label alone.
| Registry | Phase | Status | Enrollment | Lead primary endpoint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT05126758 | Phase 3 | Active, not recruiting | 106 | Change in the upper limb function |
| NCT04623671 | Phase 2 | Completed | 55 | Safety of CAP-1002: Incidence of All-Cause Mortality |
| NCT04428476 | Phase 2 | Active, not recruiting | 13 | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) From Baseline Through Month 12 |
The trial set should be diligenced for randomization, comparator relevance, endpoint hierarchy, analysis population, multiplicity, geographic mix and readout timing. For early-stage studies, safety and dose selection can be as decision-critical as response rate.

Reproduce the asset-to-trial workflow with PatSnap MCP
Phase 3; n=106; evaluation: Positive. Reported fields: PUL v2.0 = % Slowing of Progression (Deramiocel vs. Placebo) 54%, p=0.029 (n=105) Met; PUL v2.0 = % Slowing of Progression (Deramiocel vs. Placebo) 54%, p=0.029 (n=105) Met
Phase 2; n=not disclosed; evaluation: Positive. Reported fields: PUL 2.0 total score = -7.19 points ; PUL 2.0 total score = -3.46 points
Phase 2; n=13; evaluation: not stated. Reported fields: -; -; Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) From Baseline Through Month 12 = 11 Participants
These fields are structured evidence signals, not a substitute for statistical review. The next diligence pass should reconcile denominators, confidence intervals, follow-up, censoring, dose cohorts and treatment-emergent toxicity against the original abstract, registry and protocol.
Deramiocel addresses Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne, Becker Muscular Dystrophy. Commercial attractiveness rests on addressable biomarker-positive patients, treatment-line placement, duration, administration burden, pricing and displacement of entrenched standards. The modality—Stem cell therapy—must demonstrate a benefit large enough to offset class-specific safety and operational costs.
The strongest market-validation signal in this screen is partner behavior: 1 matched transaction record(s) indicate that sophisticated counterparties have assigned strategic value to the asset or its rights. That does not establish net present value; probability of success, remaining R&D spend, royalties, cost sharing and territorial scope still need modeling.
| Date | Transaction | Phase at deal | Disclosed economics |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-24 | Capricor Therapeutics and Nippon Shinyaku Enter Partnership for Exclusive Commercialization and Distribution of CAP-1002 for the Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy in the U.S. | Phase 2 | US$30.0M upfront; US$705.0M milestones |
Headline values are not directly comparable. Diligence should normalize upfront cash, equity, development and sales milestones, tiered royalties, opt-in mechanics, cost sharing, change-of-control clauses and geography.
No asset-specific patent-application milestone appeared in the returned milestone slice. That absence is not a freedom-to-operate conclusion; a dedicated family, claim, ownership, expiry, and legal-status search remains mandatory before signing.
The claim chart should separately test composition or sequence coverage, formulation and dosing, indication and biomarker claims, combinations, manufacturing know-how, prosecution history, term extensions and third-party blocking rights. Confirm that licensed patents, data and know-how track every granted territory and field.
Cross-functional diligence should also test CMC comparability, supply chain, pharmacovigilance, regulatory correspondence, data integrity, investigator concentration, partner obligations and change-of-control restrictions.
Advance diligence: development maturity and available evidence support continued investment, subject to indication-specific safety, IP, and commercial gates.
Required pre-signing gates: reproduce key efficacy analyses; complete an indication-specific safety review; run a full patent-family and freedom-to-operate search; model risk-adjusted economics by territory; and reconcile all rights, sublicenses and encumbrances.
Build your next drug-asset diligence workflow with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP Servers
Data provenance: PatSnap Drug & Asset MCP, Clinical Trials MCP, and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP; accessed 15 July 2026. Counts and status fields may change as source records update.