This Vericiguat Drug Asset Due Diligence Report was built with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP workflows. Drug & Asset MCP establishes identity, ownership and stage; Clinical Trials MCP checks design, endpoints and readouts; Company & Deal Intelligence MCP reconstructs transaction precedent. Explore the MCP servers used in this report.
Decision date: 15 July 2026. Currency fields are presented in US$ millions as returned by the deal dataset. This is a screening memorandum, not legal, medical, patent or investment advice.
Approved
Highest phase
72
Registered trials
34
Result records
3
Matched deals
Advance diligence: development maturity and available evidence support continued investment, subject to indication-specific safety, IP, and commercial gates.
The central underwriting question is whether Vericiguat can convert its Small molecule drug profile and sGC biology into clinically meaningful differentiation while preserving an investable safety, IP and commercial position.
| Asset | Vericiguat (query alias: vericiguat) |
|---|---|
| Modality / target | Small molecule drug; sGC; sGC stimulants |
| Highest global status | Approved |
| Originator | Bayer AG |
| Active developers | Bayer AG, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., MSD R&D (China) Co. Ltd. |
The MCP disease footprint includes Reduced ejection fraction co-occurrent and due to chronic heart failure, Chronic heart failure, Heart Failure. The highest-phase flag is a useful orientation point, but the licensing case depends on indication-level evidence and rights, not the global label alone.
| Registry | Phase | Status | Enrollment | Lead primary endpoint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT07697833 | Phase 4 | Not yet recruiting | 500 | Quality of life using Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) |
| NCT07668739 | Phase 4 | Not yet recruiting | 100 | NTproBNP |
| NCT07697365 | Not Applicable | Completed | 40 | Change in peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing |
The trial set should be diligenced for randomization, comparator relevance, endpoint hierarchy, analysis population, multiplicity, geographic mix and readout timing. For early-stage studies, safety and dose selection can be as decision-critical as response rate.

Reproduce the asset-to-trial workflow with PatSnap MCP
Phase 2; n=26; evaluation: Positive. Reported fields: FMD: Difference (%) = 0.7(95.0% CI, -1.1 to 2.5), P-Value = 0.4; FMD: Difference (%) = 0.7(95.0% CI, -1.1 to 2.5), P-Value = 0.4
Phase 2; n=45; evaluation: not stated. Reported fields: Absolute Change in Coronary Cross-sectional Area (in mm²) Within the Vericiguat Group as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)(Mean): P-Value = 0.0005; Absolute Change in Coronary Cross-sectional Area (in mm²) Within the Vericiguat Group as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)(Mean): P-Value = 0.0005; Absolute Change in Coronary Cross-sectional Area (in mm²) Within the Vericiguat Group as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)(Mean) = -1.11 mm^2 (Standard Deviation, 1.17)
Phase 3; n=6106; evaluation: not stated. Reported fields: Time to First Occurrence of Composite Endpoint of Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization: Participants With an Event Per 100 Patient-Years = 12.2 Pts. with event/100 patient-yrs at risk ; Time to First Occurrence of Composite Endpoint of Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization: Participants With an Event Per 100 Patient-Years = 11.3 Pts. with event/100 patient-yrs at risk ; Time to First Occurrence of Composite Endpoint of Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization: Participants With an Event Per 100 Patient-Years: Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.93(95% CI, 0.83 - 1.04), P-Value = 0.219
These fields are structured evidence signals, not a substitute for statistical review. The next diligence pass should reconcile denominators, confidence intervals, follow-up, censoring, dose cohorts and treatment-emergent toxicity against the original abstract, registry and protocol.
Vericiguat addresses Reduced ejection fraction co-occurrent and due to chronic heart failure, Chronic heart failure, Heart Failure. Commercial attractiveness rests on addressable biomarker-positive patients, treatment-line placement, duration, administration burden, pricing and displacement of entrenched standards. The modality—Small molecule drug—must demonstrate a benefit large enough to offset class-specific safety and operational costs.
The strongest market-validation signal in this screen is partner behavior: 3 matched transaction record(s) indicate that sophisticated counterparties have assigned strategic value to the asset or its rights. That does not establish net present value; probability of success, remaining R&D spend, royalties, cost sharing and territorial scope still need modeling.
| Date | Transaction | Phase at deal | Disclosed economics |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | CKD Pharm to exclusively sell Bayer’s chronic heart failure drug Verquvo | Approved | Financial terms not disclosed |
| 2024-04-05 | Bayer and Dr. Reddy’s sign a marketing and distribution agreement for second brand of Vericiguat™ in India | Approved | Financial terms not disclosed |
| 2014-05-06 | Merck pays $1B to buy into Bayer's cardio future | Approved | US$1,000.0M upfront; US$1,100.0M milestones |
Headline values are not directly comparable. Diligence should normalize upfront cash, equity, development and sales milestones, tiered royalties, opt-in mechanics, cost sharing, change-of-control clauses and geography.
The milestone feed surfaced a patent-application signal described as “Treatment of chronic heart failure with vericiguat”. The milestone feed surfaced a patent-application signal described as “2-(5-FLUORO-1-(2-FLUOROBENZYL)-1H-PYRAZOLO[3,4-b]PYRIDIN-3-YL)-5-NITROSOPYRIMIDIN-4,6-DIAMINE OR A SALT THEREOF, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, AND USE THEREOF IN THE SYNTHESIS OF VERICIGUAT”. The milestone feed surfaced a patent-application signal described as “Solid state forms of vericiguat and process for preparation thereof”.
The claim chart should separately test composition or sequence coverage, formulation and dosing, indication and biomarker claims, combinations, manufacturing know-how, prosecution history, term extensions and third-party blocking rights. Confirm that licensed patents, data and know-how track every granted territory and field.
Cross-functional diligence should also test CMC comparability, supply chain, pharmacovigilance, regulatory correspondence, data integrity, investigator concentration, partner obligations and change-of-control restrictions.
Advance diligence: development maturity and available evidence support continued investment, subject to indication-specific safety, IP, and commercial gates.
Required pre-signing gates: reproduce key efficacy analyses; complete an indication-specific safety review; run a full patent-family and freedom-to-operate search; model risk-adjusted economics by territory; and reconcile all rights, sublicenses and encumbrances.
Build your next drug-asset diligence workflow with PatSnap Life Sciences MCP Servers
Data provenance: PatSnap Drug & Asset MCP, Clinical Trials MCP, and Company & Deal Intelligence MCP; accessed 15 July 2026. Counts and status fields may change as source records update.