PF-489791

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a worldwide health problem. Traditionally, the nephroprotective treatment for CKD aims to slow progression to end-stage renal disease and includes dietary protein restriction, correction of metabolic acidosis, and renin-angiotensin system blockers. However, current standard therapeutic options may not be enough for preventing CKD progression in a subset of patients making necessary to develop novel therapeutic options to further slow renal function loss. Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors represent a class of drugs traditionally used to treat erectile dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. However, recent evidence suggests that PDE5 inhibitors may have additional therapeutic effects, such as cardioprotection and cerebrovascular protection. In the current review, we summarize PDE5 inhibitors' utility in disease states and clinical conditions related to kidney disease such as systemic hypertension and acute and chronic kidney injury and discuss the mechanisms explaining possible kidney protective roles of PDE5 inhibitors. A recently completed phase 2 trials demonstrated that the long-acting PDE5 inhibitor PF-00489791 decreased albuminuria in patients with overt diabetic nephropathy when added on top of renin-angiotensin system blockade.

Purpose: Phosphodiesterase 5A (PDE5A) inhibitors improve functional recovery in experimental models of stroke in rats when treatment is delayed and without effect on infarct volume. PDE5A is expressed to only a very limited extent in forebrain tissues, raising the possibility that the locus of effect for the inhibitors is outside the brain. To start to address this question, we determined whether PDE5A inhibitors must have the ability to cross the blood brain barrier to improve recovery. Method: After permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats, PF-5 and UK-489,791, PDE5A inhibitors that do or do not pass the blood brain barrier, were administered starting 24 h after occlusion and continued for 1 week. Motor function was assessed at intervals to 28 days using body swing and limb placement measures. Results: Both PF-5 and UK-489,791 produced improvement in motor scores over 28 days that were significantly greater than in vehicle treated animals. There was no difference in efficacy between the two PDE5A inhibitors. Conclusions: Brain penetrability appears not to be critical to the ability of a PDE5A inhibitor to improve functional recovery after experimental stroke in rats. This finding is discussed with regard to the cellular target(s) for PDE5A inhibitors mediating this effect.